The DNA Dilemma: Shaping Bioethical Technologies Together | Andrea Lei | TEDxSHSID Youth

Core Technology & Impact - CRISPR gene editing technology has the power to alter DNA, presenting immense potential as a precision tool but also raising concerns about its capacity to change any aspect of the human body [3][4][5] - Brain-computer interfaces (BCI), like gene editing, are a double-edged sword, offering therapeutic uses and enhancement possibilities, but also raising concerns about accessibility and social stratification [13][14] Ethical Considerations - Gene editing raises ethical dilemmas regarding informed consent, particularly for unborn babies who cannot provide consent for permanent genetic alterations [6][7] - The distinction between therapeutic and enhancement applications of gene editing is crucial, with therapeutic interventions potentially justifiable without explicit consent, while enhancement raises ethical questions [8][9] - Socioeconomic disparities could lead to unequal access to gene editing technologies, exacerbating social stratification and creating inequities in biological enhancement [10][11][15] Proposed Solutions - A two-part system is proposed: free innovation in labs coupled with oversight from a review committee (science, business, economics) when technology is ready for market release [16] - Education for both the public and medical professionals is crucial for informed decision-making regarding the long-term implications of gene editing technologies [17][18] - Government oversight and review committees are needed to create safeguards that reflect societal values and ensure ethical principles guide decision-making [20]