Why indicting James Comey may come back to bite Trump

Legal Analysis of Potential Indictment - The report analyzes the potential indictment of James Comey, former director of the FBI, focusing on the process and potential motivations behind it [5][6][7] - The legal analyst suggests that the indictment's specifics are unknown, and it's crucial to await factual support for the charges [7] - The report highlights the importance of due process, suggesting it may have been bypassed in this case, given the new US attorney's short tenure [9][10][11] - The legal analyst notes that a vindictive prosecution claim, while difficult to prove, might be applicable here if Comey was singled out for impermissible reasons [15] Key Individuals and Context - The report introduces Lindseay Hallan, the new US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, appointed by Donald Trump [1][2] - Hallan's previous role involved reducing the emphasis on slavery at the Smithsonian Museum [2][3] - Andrew Weissman, a former top prosecutor for the Justice Department, provides legal analysis on the situation [5] Potential Outcomes and Implications - The report suggests that Comey's team might request a speedy trial, potentially leading to a quick resolution and possible backlash against Trump [11][12][13] - A hearing on vindictive prosecution could provide Comey a platform to present witnesses and challenge the indictment [16][17] - The legal analyst expresses cautious optimism that the situation could reverse, especially if the case lacks substance [18][19] Concerns and Doubts - The report raises concerns about the rule of law and potential abuse of the legal system, comparing it to Nixonian or Hoover-type tactics [18][19] - Questions are raised about Hallan's inexperience, particularly regarding her handling of charging documents [20][21]