Trump’s unlawful call for ‘war’ on citizens met with stony silence from generals

Political Discourse & Military Involvement - The report highlights concerns over the president's unusual remarks regarding the military's role within the US, specifically focusing on domestic issues [1][2] - The analysis suggests a departure from traditional non-partisan use of the military, with the president advocating for its involvement in addressing internal conflicts [6] - The report points out the president's view of American cities as potential "training grounds" for the military, raising questions about the appropriate use of military force [3][7][8] - The analysis emphasizes the president's claim of an "invasion from within," which is deemed rhetorically false and lacking a foreign policy basis [16][17] Military Response & Protocol - The report notes the silent response of assembled military leaders to the president's remarks, adhering to military protocol regarding partisan or political statements [18][19] - The analysis underscores that military rules prohibit cheering political remarks while in uniform, emphasizing the military's commitment to defending the country and the constitution [21][22] Potential Abuse of Power & Future Implications - The report raises concerns about the president potentially testing or abusing national emergency powers in the future, possibly to influence elections [14] - The analysis suggests the president's actions could lead to a wartime footing and the summoning of war powers within the country [12] - The report indicates the president's desire to have total control of the military [27]