Retired Major General slams Pete Hegseth's dismissal of military's "rules of engagement"

Rules of Engagement Concerns - The report highlights concerns that statements from the Secretary of Defense, the President, and Steven Miller could be interpreted as potentially leading to war crimes [2] - The importance of clearly defined rules of engagement for military personnel is emphasized, with each individual typically carrying a card outlining these rules for specific missions [1] - Rules of engagement are intended to protect both military personnel and civilians in combat zones [2][3] Identifying the Enemy - The report asserts that not everyone encountered in a conflict zone is an enemy [4] - The report suggests the "enemy within" is not the American people or the American military, leaving the identification of this enemy open to interpretation [4] Ethical Considerations in Combat - The report questions the ethical implications of military actions, specifically regarding potential harm to civilians, such as families collecting food [3] - The report stresses the importance of distinguishing between combatants and non-combatants in a combat zone [3] - Maintaining positive relationships with the local population, even while pursuing enemies, is deemed crucial [3]