'Very close to an Autocracy’: Blue states CHECK Trump amid legal firestorm over troop deployments

Government & Legal - The report highlights the Trump administration's expanded use of militarized federal forces in American cities, particularly in places perceived as opposition [2][6][7] - Legal challenges are being mounted by states like Illinois, Oregon, and California against the federal government's deployment of guard troops across state lines [17] - A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration, emphasizing the importance of constitutional law over martial law [8][17][18] Political & Social Commentary - The report suggests the administration's actions are perceived as partisan targeting and an abuse of power, potentially normalizing the use of the military to quell protests and enforce a political agenda [6][7][13][14] - Concerns are raised about the potential for a gradual erosion of democratic norms, leading to a situation where militarized forces become commonplace [19][20] - The use of federal force is not uniform across the country, raising questions about whether it is being applied selectively in areas perceived as opposition [6][7] Military & Law Enforcement - The report mentions the potential deployment of the Army's 82nd Airborne, an infantry division typically used in combat zones, within the United States [9] - Federal agents are shown using tear gas and other crowd control methods against protesters, raising concerns about the appropriate use of force [3][5] - The report notes that the military is legally restricted from patrolling American citizens, but the Trump administration has at times seemed to disregard this restriction [15]