Supreme Court weighs key provision of Voting Rights Act

Voting Rights Act & Supreme Court - The Supreme Court appears inclined to limit civil rights groups' ability to challenge state maps under the Voting Rights Act [1] - Justice Kavanaugh suggests restrictions on race-based remedies for redistricting violations, advocating for an endpoint to such measures [2] - The Supreme Court unusually reheard a Louisiana redistricting case, signaling a broader review of Voting Rights Act compliance and potential constitutional conflicts [8][9] - Key justices, including Kavanaugh and Roberts, may be reconsidering their previous support for the Voting Rights Act, influenced by skepticism towards race-based remedies [11][12] Redistricting & Political Impact - A redistricting "arms race" is underway, with multiple states considering new maps, potentially influenced by presidential urging to create more Republican-leaning seats [2][3] - Overturning Section Two could lead to as many as 27 seats being drawn as safe Republican seats, potentially reshaping legislatures and congressional representation [15] - Aggressive gerrymandering could backfire, leading to competitive districts and voter backlash against perceived political manipulation [17] - Louisiana has requested a ruling by January to potentially redraw maps for the 2026 midterm elections, potentially prompting other states to follow suit [19]