Will the U.S. send Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine?: Trump meets Zelenskyy today

Geopolitical Strategy & Security - The potential deployment of Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine is viewed as a critical factor in influencing Putin and achieving a peace deal, with the current moment seen as an opportune time to increase pressure [5] - Tomahawk missiles are not expected to make a major difference on the battlefield, but they will help prevent the ongoing humanitarian disaster because Russia is taking out Ukraine's energy grid [2] - The symbolic impact of a Tomahawk landing in Russian territory is considered a significant "make or break" moment for Putin, potentially leading to public disapproval [3] - The US should provide Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine and make it clear that it is in the strategic interest of the US that Ukraine defeats Russia [10] - Concerns exist regarding the current administration's commitment to standing by Ukraine and imposing consequences on Russia, given past actions and recent communications [12] Economic Impact & Warfare - Destroying Russia's oil and gas infrastructure is identified as a key vulnerability, and Tomahawk missiles could significantly enhance Ukraine's capability in this area [7] - Eroding Russia's ability to export oil and gas to countries like China, India, and Turkey would make it increasingly difficult for Russia to finance the war [8] - Ukraine's existing drone capabilities are insufficient to carry the necessary warheads or reach the required distances to significantly impact Russia's war financing [9] Diplomatic Efforts & Negotiations - Ukraine is willing to engage in discussions with Putin anywhere except in Russia and Belarus, highlighting the importance of maintaining dialogue [4] - The success of potential summits and negotiations hinges on sustaining pressure on Putin and preventing him from employing delay tactics [13][14]