X @Mayne
Mayne·2025-10-22 20:34

Core Argument - The argument that a funded account is equivalent to its maximum drawdown is flawed, as buying power and loss budget are distinct [1] - Funded accounts offer higher leverage compared to personal accounts, reducing the risk of liquidation [2][3] - Funded accounts provide limited downside risk (evaluation fee) and unlimited upside potential, with risk managed through drawdown rules [4] Value Proposition of Funded Accounts - Funded accounts offer a significantly higher dollar per risk ($/R) compared to personal accounts, allowing for larger potential payouts with a smaller fraction of drawdown [3] - Breakout accounts provide leverage (5x for BTC, 2x for alts), making it challenging to replicate the notional value with personal accounts [3] - With a larger capital base in funded accounts, traders can achieve the same dollar return with less risk [5] Industry Context and Validation - The funded account model has been successful in FX and futures for over a decade, demonstrating its viability [4] - Top traders on the platform have generated substantial profits, indicating the potential of the product [4] - The company emphasizes that its product is not a scam, highlighting its acquisition by Kraken after due diligence [4]