‘A symptom of the problem’: Rep. Crockett explains why so many rely on SNAP with funding up in air
MSNBC·2025-11-01 22:42

Government Shutdown & Political Landscape - Discussions to reopen the government are occurring, potentially through bottom-up efforts due to disruptions like travel interference and SNAP/WIC benefit concerns [1] - The speaker suggests two potential solutions to the government shutdown: reducing the threshold from 60 to 50 votes (nuclear option) or engaging in genuine negotiations regarding the Affordable Care Act [2] - The House of Representatives, under current leadership, has not completed the 12 appropriations bills, which could alleviate the need for continuing resolutions and allow government departments to resume operations [3][4] SNAP Benefits & Economic Factors - A federal judge ordered the continuation of SNAP benefits during the shutdown, impacting 42 million Americans, including 35 million in Texas [5] - The speaker agrees that too many Americans rely on SNAP benefits, attributing it to factors like low minimum wage ($7) and the prevalence of the working poor [6][7] - The speaker claims the country has seen a loss of 1 million jobs in the early months of the current administration [8] - The speaker highlights the disparity between the increasing wealth of billionaires and the struggles of those relying on food banks and SNAP/EBT cards, with 55% of SNAP users being families with children [10][11] Healthcare & Insurance Coverage - The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates that 17% of Texas' population lacked health insurance coverage in 2024, and over 1 million could become uninsured if subsidies expire [12] - The lack of health insurance coverage leads to increased emergency room visits, ultimately raising insurance premiums for everyone [14][15] Potential Senate Run - The speaker is considering a run for Senate in Texas, a state that hasn't elected a Democrat statewide in over 30 years [16] - The decision hinges on the ability to expand the electorate and engage people who haven't previously been involved in politics [17][18]