Justice Jackson and Solicitor General Sauer spar at Trump tariff showdown

and council Al Gangquin wasn't a textualist opinion. Do you agree with that. In other words, the analysis that the court was using there was really keyed to the legislative history of that statute and it wasn't as though we were doing an interpretation of the word adjust.I I disagree with that. I think you read the opinion first it talks about plain meaning, then it talks about statutory context and then it goes on to legislative history. So, it was all three of those.And the conclusion it came to it it it ...