X @Nick Szabo

Bitcoin Development & Risk Assessment - The industry expresses a desire for more trust-minimized and less risky solutions than BIP 444 for financial transaction immutability [1] - The industry acknowledges the value in addressing SegWit discount and inscription-related bugs [2] - The industry is concerned about added complexity and risk associated with comprehensive forks [2] - The industry emphasizes the need for independent developer inspection and analysis of more complicated forks [2] Bitcoin Functionality & Spam Mitigation - The industry aims to minimize the rugging of useful financial functionality while addressing spam [3] - The industry wants to rug spammers, specifically those using Bitcoin for legible content [3] Fork Considerations - The industry supports simple soft forks [2] - The industry suggests a more comprehensive fork would require more time for analysis [2]