FBI 'doesn't have' authority to question Dems in video if there's no offense: Ex-Senior official

FBI Investigation & Political Implications - The FBI requested interviews with members of Congress, raising questions about potential intimidation or improper use of resources, especially concerning First Amendment rights [1] - Experts suggest the FBI typically requires a predicate offense and high-level approval to investigate members of Congress, which appears lacking in this situation [1][2] - The investigation is seen as a potential waste of FBI resources, diverting attention from critical areas like espionage, counterintelligence, terrorism, and financial fraud [4][5] Administration's Actions & Political Risks - The administration's focus on investigating political opponents is viewed as a distraction from pressing issues like affordability and the economy, potentially harming the party's prospects in upcoming elections [8][9] - The investigation of veterans and public figures like Mark Kelly could elevate their message and create political risks for the administration [2] - The administration's actions are perceived as a "retribution campaign," targeting individuals based on their political views and dealings with banks and mortgage companies [12] Legal & Ethical Concerns - A lawsuit alleges potential violations of the Federal Privacy Act and First Amendment rights, accusing officials of using information for political purposes [11] - Concerns are raised about a "crisis of leadership" and unqualified individuals in positions of power due to loyalty to the administration, potentially leading to unethical or illegal actions [14][15]