‘Deeply disturbing’: House Dem blasts ‘anything but’ transparent DOJ after Epstein files disappear

Epstein Files Transparency Act Concerns - The Epstein Files Transparency Act is facing criticism due to redactions and missing files, raising concerns about transparency [1] - Victims of Epstein are seeking the release of all information to clear their names, particularly a 60-count indictment and an 82-page memo [1] - Some lawmakers are considering actions like impeachment or prosecution for those obstructing justice in the release of the files [1] DOJ Transparency and Accountability - Concerns are raised about the trustworthiness of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Attorney General in handling the Epstein case [1] - Questions arise regarding potential cover-ups and lack of straightforwardness in the release of documents [1] - Lawmakers are considering introducing articles of impeachment against Pam Bondi [2] Document Release and Legal Privileges - The DOJ's review of documents is ongoing, with redactions for victim protection deemed appropriate [3] - The assertion of privileges, such as work product privilege and attorney-client privilege, is being used to withhold information, including prosecution memos and draft indictments [4][5][6] - The client in attorney-client privilege is questioned, with concerns that it may be serving President Trump rather than the public [6] Concerns Regarding Full Disclosure - Todd Blanch's commitment to releasing all documents, including those with Donald Trump's name, is questioned [8] - There are concerns about deliberate choices being made to avoid full transparency and explanation to the American people [9] - The House oversight Democrats are working closely with victims to identify missing files and ensure accountability [2]