Scrutiny grows over missing Epstein files, partial drop

Epstein Files Release & Transparency - The DOJ released heavily redacted Epstein files, facing criticism for slow and incomplete disclosure despite legal requirements [1][2] - The released files contained previously public information, offering limited new insights into Epstein's connections [2][12] - A photo of President Trump with unidentified females was temporarily removed from the DOJ website, sparking controversy [3][4] - The DOJ stated the photo was removed due to potential victim concerns and later restored without redaction after review [5][7] - Lawmakers are considering action against Attorney General Pam Bondi for not fully releasing the documents [8][9] Legal & Political Implications - The release is mandated by the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act, requiring classified documents to be posted within 30 days [7][8] - Congressman Ro Connor and Republican Thomas Massie are considering inherent contempt against Pam Bondi for non-compliance [7][9] - The DOJ claims to believe in equal justice and will bring charges against those involved in trafficking and exploitation [10] - The Trump administration defends its actions, citing victim protection and legal privileges as reasons for redactions [4][5] - Concerns are raised about the DOJ's transparency, with accusations of being forced into compliance and not fully adhering to the law [18][20]