行家说储能·2025-05-07 06:24Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent developments in the energy storage industry, highlighting the performance and strategies of key companies in response to market changes and regulatory impacts, particularly focusing on the upcoming "Document 136" and its implications for the sector [2][17][18]. Company Performance and Strategies - Trina Solar: Aims for a storage shipment target of 8-10 GWh in 2025, with a 2024 shipment of 4.3 GWh, indicating a focus on overseas markets, especially Europe, and a significant increase in orders [2][3]. - Canadian Solar: Reported a Q1 storage shipment of 0.79 GWh, with a full-year target of 6.5 GWh, reflecting over 500% year-on-year growth. Despite challenges from U.S. tariffs, the company maintained profitability with a net profit of 87.3 million yuan in Q1 [4]. - Hibos Technology: Achieved nearly 3 GWh in sales in Q1 2025, with a focus on expanding overseas projects in Europe, North America, and Southeast Asia. The company aims for overseas revenue to match domestic levels within 3-5 years [5]. - Southern Power Grid Technology: Reported over 1 billion yuan in storage revenue in Q1, despite a 37.5% year-on-year decline due to project timelines. The company has a robust order backlog of approximately 9.5 billion yuan [6][7]. Market Trends and Regulatory Impact - The recent large-scale power outages in Southern Europe have increased the demand for energy storage solutions, emphasizing their importance in stabilizing power systems during extreme weather events [9]. - Companies are adapting to U.S. tariff barriers by exploring non-U.S. markets and enhancing supply chain flexibility. Trina Solar and Canadian Solar are both actively assessing the impact of tariffs on their operations and adjusting strategies accordingly [10][13][14]. - The implementation of "Document 136" is expected to disrupt the storage market in the short term by removing mandatory storage requirements, but it may lead to long-term growth and a more competitive landscape, favoring companies with technological and cost advantages [17][18].