五矿证券、中审众环被书面警示！所涉IPO项目去年终止审核

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses regulatory actions taken against Wuhang Securities, Zhongshen Zhonghuan Accounting Firm, and Shanxi Ningguoli New Materials Co., Ltd. due to multiple violations identified during the IPO process, leading to the termination of the company's IPO review on January 18, 2024 [1][3][4]. Summary by Sections Regulatory Actions - Shenzhen Stock Exchange issued regulatory letters to Wuhang Securities and Zhongshen Zhonghuan Accounting Firm, along with criticisms directed at the responsible parties including the signing accountants and the sponsoring representatives [1][2]. Violations Identified - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) found numerous violations during the on-site inspection, including inadequate verification of the issuer's product-related matters, revenue recognition, internal controls, and other operational aspects [3][4][5]. Specific Violations by Wuhang Securities - Wuhang Securities failed to adequately verify the issuer's product-related matters, including discrepancies in inventory and revenue recognition processes. For instance, the issuer's inventory of products sent to customers was not properly accounted for, with significant discrepancies noted [5][6][7]. - The firm did not execute sufficient procedures for revenue recognition, with instances of revenue being recognized without proper documentation, affecting the accuracy of financial reporting [7][8][22]. Violations by Shanxi Ningguoli - Shanxi Ningguoli and its executives were found to have provided misleading information regarding product dispatch and revenue recognition, failing to disclose internal control deficiencies [4][20][21]. - The company reported significant figures in R&D expenses, but internal controls related to R&D were found to be inadequate, with discrepancies in the recognition of R&D personnel and expenses [9][23]. Other Internal Control Issues - The issuer's internal controls regarding raw material procurement and production were also found lacking, impacting the accuracy of cost accounting. The separation of incompatible duties was not effectively implemented [10][24]. - Issues were identified in the verification of sales service providers, with inadequate checks on the authenticity of transactions and the accuracy of service fee accruals [12][13]. Conclusion - The regulatory actions highlight the importance of compliance with internal controls and accurate financial reporting in the IPO process, emphasizing the need for thorough due diligence by sponsoring institutions [18][19].