Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding Huaxi Biological, a leading player in the medical aesthetics industry, which publicly refuted claims made by nine brokerage firms regarding the obsolescence of hyaluronic acid, asserting that these claims mislead the market and harm the industry [2][5][13]. Group 1: Industry Response - Huaxi Biological received support from two industry associations before making its statement and has reported the misleading content to the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) [2][12]. - Following Huaxi's public rebuttal, some brokerage firms have deleted their reports, and certain institutions have issued apologies to the company [2][12]. - The brokerage reports in question were primarily focused on the emerging concept of recombinant collagen, which Huaxi argues is being promoted at the expense of hyaluronic acid [5][13]. Group 2: Misleading Claims - Huaxi Biological criticized the brokerage reports for making misleading comparisons between hyaluronic acid and recombinant collagen, claiming that these reports lacked scientific basis and were driven by speculative capital [5][13]. - The company highlighted that the reports suggested hyaluronic acid was inferior to recombinant collagen in terms of safety and efficacy, which Huaxi disputes, stating that such conclusions are not supported by scientific evidence [5][31]. Group 3: Regulatory and Compliance Issues - The article raises concerns about the compliance of the brokerage reports, suggesting that they may not have adhered to the necessary standards for objectivity and scientific backing [20][21]. - Industry experts indicate that the reports should have included relevant data to support their claims, and the lack of such data could lead to regulatory scrutiny [21][22]. - The ongoing regulatory environment is described as increasingly stringent, with past instances of penalties for brokerage firms due to similar issues [26][27]. Group 4: Scientific Basis of Claims - Huaxi Biological argues that both hyaluronic acid and recombinant collagen have their unique applications and benefits, and it is inappropriate to declare one superior to the other without substantial scientific evidence [31][32]. - The company emphasizes that the existing research favors hyaluronic acid in certain applications, particularly in skin hydration and immediate filling, while recombinant collagen may have advantages in tissue repair [31][32].