ChatGPT 评估员工绩效，评得是真能力吗？

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that relying on AI for key management tasks, such as performance evaluations, may lead to a decline in essential managerial skills, rather than being a step forward in efficiency [1][2][3]. Group 1: The Role of AI in Management - AI is seen as a tool that can assist but should not replace the cognitive functions of a manager [8][9]. - Over-reliance on AI for management tasks can hinder personal growth and skill development, as it removes the opportunity for practice and learning [6][13]. - Effective management requires deep engagement and personal judgment, which AI cannot replicate [23][25]. Group 2: Performance Evaluation Insights - Writing performance evaluations is not inherently difficult; it reflects the manager's growth and understanding of their role [4][5]. - Performance evaluations should be viewed as a developmental exercise for managers, not just a task to complete [7][18]. - AI can be useful for repetitive tasks like resume screening and compliance reminders, but it should not be used for nuanced evaluations that require human insight [19][21]. Group 3: Community Reactions and Concerns - There is a widespread concern that AI may exacerbate existing issues in performance evaluation systems, which are often seen as arbitrary and politically motivated [25][26]. - Critics argue that AI could make poor management practices more efficient, rather than improving the quality of evaluations [25][26]. - Some believe that while AI can assist in structuring information, it should not replace the manager's ability to observe and make judgments about their team [25][26].