美国国际贸易法院裁定“特朗普关税”违法

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Court ruled that Trump's tariff policy exceeded presidential authority, ordering the government to cease the tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) [1][2]. Group 1 - The court's ruling is the first judicial decision regarding Trump's second-term tariff policy, which includes tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, justified under the guise of combating illegal drugs [2]. - The court determined that the president does not have the authority to impose tariffs globally, stating that IEEPA does not grant such power [2]. - The ruling declared the series of tariffs invalid and mandated the government to "permanently stop" these measures [2]. Group 2 - The Trump administration is expected to appeal the ruling, with White House spokesperson Kush DeSai asserting that decisions on emergency responses should not be made by unelected judges [1][2]. - IEEPA allows the president to regulate financial transactions during a national emergency but does not explicitly authorize the imposition of tariffs [2]. - The authority to levy tariffs is constitutionally vested in the federal Congress, and at least eight lawsuits have been filed challenging the constitutionality of Trump's tariffs [2].