四大顶尖模型对决！6000 字测评带你看Deepseek R1有多强

Core Viewpoint - Deepseek-R1 0528 demonstrates strong performance in front-end development tasks, comparable to OpenAI's Opus 4 and surpassing Sonnet 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, especially considering the price difference [3][4][51]. Group 1: Model Performance Comparison - In front-end capabilities, Deepseek-R1 0528 slightly lags behind Opus 4 but outperforms Sonnet 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro [3]. - Deepseek-R1 0528 successfully completed complex tasks that Opus 4 struggled with, although the quality and completion rate were slightly lower [3][4]. - The price of Deepseek-R1 0528 is significantly lower than Opus 4, making its performance even more impressive [4][51]. Group 2: Testing Results - In the warehouse management system test, Deepseek-R1 0528 produced a professional interface with complete functionality, while other models failed to deliver usable outputs [11]. - For the dot animation editor, Deepseek-R1 0528 excelled, providing a fully functional interface, while other models either failed to animate or had significant issues [17]. - In the gradient color extraction tool test, Deepseek-R1 0528 showcased excellent aesthetic design but failed to implement the color extraction logic, while Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 managed to complete the functionality albeit with simpler designs [20][21]. Group 3: Overall Implications - The advancements in Deepseek-R1 0528 suggest a shift in the AI programming model landscape, where high-quality outputs can be achieved at a fraction of the cost compared to leading competitors [51]. - The performance of Deepseek-R1 0528 indicates a potential democratization of access to advanced AI tools, allowing more users to leverage powerful models without prohibitive costs [51].