短暂喘息！哈佛大学暂时保留国际生招收资质，30天后呢？

Core Viewpoint - The recent court hearing provides a temporary reprieve for Harvard University, allowing it to continue enrolling international students amidst ongoing legal challenges from the Trump administration [2][3]. Group 1: Court Hearing and Legal Developments - On May 29, a federal judge in Massachusetts approved Harvard's request for a preliminary injunction, halting the Trump administration's policy to revoke the university's ability to enroll international students [2][6]. - The judge, Allison D. Burroughs, stated that the temporary restraining order (TRO) will remain in effect until the next hearing, which has yet to be scheduled [2][6]. - The Department of Homeland Security plans to challenge Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP) certification through administrative means [2][6]. Group 2: Implications for Higher Education - The hearing is seen as a significant test for the U.S. higher education system, reflecting the tension between political pressures and academic independence [3]. - Harvard's legal team argued that the Trump administration's actions violate the First Amendment rights granted to the university, emphasizing the ongoing harm caused by the government's actions [10][11]. - If the injunction is not upheld, Harvard could face severe financial and operational impacts, including the freezing of approximately $3 billion in federal research funding and the potential loss of $100 million in contract support [11]. Group 3: Responses from Stakeholders - Harvard's international office expressed concerns about the emotional distress faced by students due to the uncertainty surrounding their visa status and the potential for administrative reviews [8][11]. - The university's statement highlighted the importance of international students to its academic mission and the broader implications for the U.S. higher education reputation [11].