Workflow
Redis 之父:哪怕被喷我也得说,AI 远远落后于人类程序员!开发者跟评:用大模型气得我自己写代码都有劲儿了
猿大侠·2025-05-31 04:27

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that while AI has made significant advancements, human programmers still possess superior creativity and problem-solving abilities compared to large language models [2][9]. Group 1: Antirez's Experience - Antirez, the creator of Redis, shares his experience in developing Vector Sets and fixing a complex bug, highlighting the limitations of AI in providing innovative solutions [3][9]. - He encountered a performance issue when loading a large vector set, which led him to consult the AI model Gemini for faster solutions, but found its suggestions lacking [5][6]. - Ultimately, Antirez developed a more effective method for checking link interchangeability, demonstrating human ingenuity in problem-solving [8][9]. Group 2: Developer Perspectives on AI - Some developers view AI as a valuable tool for brainstorming and refining ideas, likening it to a "rubber duck" that aids in debugging [10][11]. - However, there are concerns about AI's reliability, with developers noting that it can sometimes provide incorrect suggestions, leading to confusion and wasted time [13]. - Experienced developers can discern AI's limitations, while less experienced ones may struggle to identify errors in AI-generated code, raising concerns about the potential impact on learning programming skills [13][14]. Group 3: Future of Programming with AI - Industry leaders predict that AI will increasingly automate coding tasks, with estimates suggesting that AI could write up to 90% of code in the near future [14][15]. - Despite these advancements, the role of human programmers is expected to evolve rather than disappear, as they will transition to guiding AI in coding tasks [15]. - The article concludes that the focus should shift from whether AI will replace software engineers to how engineers can adapt and evolve alongside AI technologies [15].