Workflow
六大AI同写高考作文 文学评论家周泽雄毒舌点评
经济观察报·2025-06-07 12:55

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a simulated exam for high school essays using six prominent domestic AI writing models, highlighting their capabilities and limitations in generating essays that reflect the depth of thought and language expression expected in high-stakes assessments [2][4][24]. Group 1: AI Models and Evaluation - Six AI models participated in the simulated exam: Tencent Yuanbao, Deepseek, Baidu Wenxin Yiyan, Quark, ByteDance Doubao, and iFlytek Xinghuo [2][4]. - The evaluation was conducted by three literary critics and involved anonymous peer reviews among the AI models, creating a multidimensional assessment matrix with a maximum score of 60 [4][23]. Group 2: Essay Themes and Content - The essays generated by the AI models explored themes of national spirit, personal struggle, and cultural resilience, drawing on historical and literary references [6][18]. - Each essay presented a unique perspective, with some focusing on the challenges of expression in difficult times, while others emphasized the connection between individual fate and national identity [10][18][24]. Group 3: Performance and Feedback - The AI models demonstrated strong language fluency and emotional depth, particularly in their use of cultural references and narrative techniques [24][25]. - However, there were noted deficiencies in the substantive content and depth of thought, with critiques pointing to a tendency for superficiality and a lack of coherent argumentation [24][25].