张津剑：投资中的频率与频谱

Group 1 - The core argument of the article is that the current state of human attention is deteriorating, leading to a loss of independent judgment and increasing societal fragmentation, while AI, through its attention mechanisms, is becoming more focused and goal-oriented [1][4][24] - The article discusses the differences between human and AI attention mechanisms, highlighting that AI can enhance its capabilities through computational power, while humans must rely on focus and restraint [1][4][6] - It emphasizes the importance of attention management for entrepreneurs and investors, suggesting that those who can concentrate their attention effectively will find more opportunities in the evolving landscape [15][20][40] Group 2 - The article explains the concept of attention as a filtering mechanism that helps humans process information amidst noise, likening it to a signal processing system [4][8][10] - It presents the idea that human perception is limited compared to processing and output capabilities, with a significant gap between the amount of information received and what can be acted upon [6][7] - The phenomenon of "herding" behavior is discussed, where individuals tend to follow trends rather than making independent decisions, leading to market bubbles and volatility [12][14] Group 3 - The article posits that the future of AI will involve a combination of sensors, agents, and embodied intelligence, which will allow for a broader spectrum of perception and processing capabilities [35][36] - It critiques current projects that are still centered around human capabilities, advocating for a shift towards an AI-centered approach in organizing work [37][38] - The unique values of humans in the AI era are identified as the ability to create demand and the capacity for aesthetic judgment, which AI lacks [39][44]