

Core Viewpoint - The automotive industry is responding to national calls to unify payment terms to suppliers within 60 days, addressing long-standing issues of delayed payments and cash flow challenges faced by suppliers [1][7][9]. Group 1: Industry Response - GAC Group was the first to announce the commitment to a 60-day payment term for suppliers on June 10 [2]. - Following GAC, major state-owned enterprises like FAW and Dongfeng also made similar announcements, emphasizing their responsibility and leadership in the industry [3]. - Other leading companies such as Seres, Geely, Changan, and BYD quickly followed suit, indicating a collective industry shift towards shorter payment terms [4][5]. Group 2: Payment Terms Context - Historically, the average payment cycle for domestic automotive companies has exceeded 170 days, with some companies reaching over 240 days, contrasting sharply with international counterparts like Toyota and Ford, which average around 54 to 64 days [10][11]. - The long payment terms have been attributed to intense market competition, where manufacturers have used suppliers as a "zero-interest funding pool" to alleviate their financial pressures [10][19]. Group 3: Regulatory Framework - The revised "Regulations on Guaranteeing Payment to Small and Medium Enterprises" came into effect on June 1, aiming to address issues of prolonged payment cycles and unclear responsibilities [21][22]. - The new regulations include a rigid 60-day payment requirement and prohibit non-cash payment methods that could extend payment periods, aiming to create a more equitable environment for suppliers [31]. Group 4: Market Implications - The shift to a 60-day payment term is expected to enhance the resilience of the supply chain, reducing the risk of cash flow crises for suppliers and improving overall liquidity in the industry [25][28]. - However, this change may impose greater financial pressure on automotive manufacturers in the short term, as they adapt to the new payment structure [24][26]. Group 5: Industry Sentiment - There is a mix of optimism and skepticism among industry stakeholders regarding the implementation of the 60-day payment term, with many questioning the actual enforcement and potential loopholes [29][30]. - The sentiment reflects a broader concern about trust and confidence in the industry's ability to adhere to the new regulations and genuinely improve supplier relationships [29][32].