第一财经·2025-06-16 07:39Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant financial and legal issues surrounding Huaming Equipment's divestiture of its subsidiary Guizhou Changzheng Electric Co., which was sold for 1 million yuan after being acquired for 398 million yuan six years prior. The divestiture was prompted by a lawsuit against Guizhou Changzheng for debt repayment, revealing deeper connections to a larger financial scheme involving multiple companies and individuals [1][2][6]. Group 1 - Huaming Equipment plans to transfer 100% of its subsidiary Guizhou Changzheng for 1 million yuan, a stark contrast to the 398 million yuan paid six years ago [1][2]. - The transfer is a direct result of a lawsuit against Guizhou Changzheng, which acted as a guarantor for a loan exceeding 270 million yuan [2][5]. - The investigation reveals that the loan was part of a larger scheme involving 11 billion yuan in loans to three "mini" trading companies, backed by a complex network of 16 guarantors [2][10][23]. Group 2 - The loans were issued by Lanzhou Bank, which later transferred the debt to Sanwei Huicheng, raising questions about the compliance and transparency of the lending process [3][36]. - The three borrowing companies, despite having minimal registered capital, received substantial loans due to the extensive guarantee network, which included individuals and companies with questionable financial health [22][23]. - The article highlights the intricate relationships between the borrowing companies and the guarantors, suggesting a coordinated effort to secure financing despite apparent risks [10][28]. Group 3 - The guarantors include individuals and companies linked to the "Galaxy System," which has a history of financial misconduct and regulatory scrutiny [32][33]. - The article discusses the implications of these relationships, particularly in the context of the bankruptcy restructuring of Jianxin Group, which was closely tied to the loans issued [29][30]. - Concerns are raised about the regulatory oversight of Lanzhou Bank, especially given its status as a publicly listed entity during the loan issuance [35][36].