美国钻地弹炸开了战争之门，还是炸开了谈判大门？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent U.S. military action against Iran's nuclear facilities and its implications for potential conflict or negotiation between the two nations [1][7][10]. Summary by Sections U.S. Military Action - On June 22, U.S. President Trump ordered a surprise bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, utilizing over 125 aircraft and a submarine, resulting in the destruction of three nuclear sites [2][3]. - The operation was named "Midnight Hammer" and involved the deployment of 14 Gbu-57 bombs and 24 cruise missiles [2]. International Reactions - The U.S. action was met with global condemnation, including a strong denunciation from China, which highlighted violations of international law and the potential for nuclear disaster [4][5][6]. Potential Consequences - The article posits that the key indicator of future relations will be whether Iran retaliates against U.S. military bases in the region [7][8]. - Iran's Revolutionary Guard has threatened severe retaliation, labeling U.S. personnel in the region as legitimate targets [8]. Iran's Possible Responses - Iran has two potential responses: a limited, symbolic retaliation or a decision to refrain from further conflict [12][14]. - The article suggests that Iran may choose to avoid escalation, as indicated by their communication to the International Atomic Energy Agency that radiation levels remained stable post-attack [15][16]. Future Negotiations - Despite the military action, the article concludes that the door for negotiations regarding the Iran nuclear issue has not yet opened, primarily due to ongoing hostilities between Israel and Iran [17][18].