凤凰网财经·2025-07-02 13:50Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent controversy surrounding Juzhi Biotechnology (巨子生物) and its admission of limitations in quality standards and testing methods, which has raised further questions about the integrity of its products and the broader implications for the industry [2][4][10]. Group 1: Company Response and Market Impact - Juzhi Biotechnology acknowledged its limitations in quality standards and testing methods, marking a significant shift from its previous defensive stance against accusations regarding its collagen products [4][10]. - Following the controversy, Juzhi's stock price fell from 87.1 HKD to 53.9 HKD, resulting in a market capitalization loss of over 330 billion HKD [10]. - The company's internal investor meeting indicated confidence in recovering from short-term impacts, despite the ongoing public skepticism [4][11]. Group 2: Industry Context and Competition - The controversy highlights a broader "ingredient war" between Juzhi Biotechnology and Huaxi Biotechnology (华熙生物), with both companies competing in the collagen and hyaluronic acid markets [14][15]. - Huaxi Biotechnology, a leader in the hyaluronic acid market, has criticized Juzhi's claims about collagen superiority, emphasizing the lack of scientific basis for such assertions [15][16]. - The article suggests that the current lack of unified testing standards in the collagen industry poses challenges for quality control and consumer trust [17][19]. Group 3: Consumer Trust and Market Dynamics - The incident has led to a decline in consumer trust, particularly among core users who prioritize ingredient efficacy, which could have long-term repercussions for Juzhi's brand reputation [12][13]. - The article notes a shift in consumer behavior towards more informed purchasing decisions, moving from concept-driven marketing to a focus on ingredient transparency and scientific validation [23][24]. - The controversy may catalyze regulatory changes and industry standards, potentially leading to a market reshuffle where companies lacking core R&D capabilities may struggle to survive [22][24].