Workflow
AI杀死了破折号,也绞杀了语文。
数字生命卡兹克·2025-07-03 18:17

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the phenomenon of using specific punctuation marks, particularly the dash and quotation marks, as a means to identify AI-generated content, highlighting a cultural shift in communication styles due to the prevalence of AI writing [1][7][36]. Group 1 - The dash and quotation marks have become symbols for identifying AI-generated content, leading to a cultural backlash against their use [27][19]. - The article suggests that the overuse of these punctuation marks by AI reflects a lack of genuine human expression and emotional depth [16][18]. - The phenomenon is likened to a historical "shibboleth," a linguistic marker used to distinguish between groups, now applied to differentiate human writing from AI [23][25]. Group 2 - The article argues that the reliance on simple markers for AI detection results in a degradation of language richness and complexity, as humans begin to avoid sophisticated expressions to prove their authenticity [36][40]. - It highlights a cyclical pattern where AI adapts to human language changes, leading to a continuous evolution of communication styles that may ultimately diminish linguistic quality [33][34]. - The conclusion emphasizes the irony that in an effort to distinguish themselves from AI, humans may inadvertently embrace a more primitive and less articulate form of communication [39][42].