事关稳定币！深圳发布风险提示

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the risks associated with stablecoins, emphasizing the need for public awareness and caution against illegal financial activities disguised as stablecoin investments [3][4][6]. Group 1: Risks of Stablecoins - The Shenzhen Special Task Force warns that illegal organizations are exploiting the public's lack of understanding of stablecoins to engage in fraudulent activities, including illegal fundraising, gambling, and money laundering [3][4]. - The Task Force emphasizes that these organizations lack the necessary licenses from national financial authorities and are not authorized to publicly solicit deposits [3][4]. - The article stresses the importance of rational investment awareness among the public to avoid falling victim to deceptive promises related to stablecoin investments [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Responses - Multiple regulatory bodies and international financial organizations have issued risk warnings regarding the recent surge in interest in stablecoins [6]. - The Hong Kong Monetary Authority's CEO, Yu Weiwen, indicates that while public interest in stablecoins is welcomed, it is essential to maintain a balanced perspective and mitigate potential risks [6][7]. - The article notes that stablecoins are not intended for investment or speculation but serve as payment tools utilizing blockchain technology, with their future development largely dependent on market forces [7]. Group 3: International Concerns - The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) expresses skepticism about stablecoins, stating they do not meet the requirements to be a pillar of the monetary system and raise concerns about their potential use in money laundering and terrorism financing [8]. - The BIS report highlights that stablecoins have become a preferred method for illegal activities due to their anonymity and lack of traditional financial safeguards like Know Your Customer (KYC) standards [8]. - The report concludes that while demand for stablecoins may persist, they perform poorly in system-level integrity tests, raising significant regulatory challenges [8].