高校开放争议背后，是安全主义的泥沼

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining open campuses in universities while balancing safety concerns, arguing against the extreme pursuit of absolute safety that can hinder growth and learning opportunities for students [4][5][7]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A recent incident at Shanghai Jiao Tong University involved a conflict between a parent and a student, raising concerns about campus safety and the implications of open campuses [2][3]. - Opponents of campus openness argue that such incidents highlight potential safety risks and disrupt the educational environment, suggesting a need for more controlled access [3]. Group 2: Arguments for Campus Openness - The article argues that despite safety concerns, universities should remain open, as the current level of openness has not yet returned to pre-pandemic standards [4][5]. - It highlights that the focus should not be on whether to open campuses, but rather on how to do so effectively while fostering a consensus on acceptable risk levels [4][5]. Group 3: Safety vs. Growth - The pursuit of absolute safety can lead to a detrimental "safetyism" mindset, which may deprive young adults of essential experiences needed for resilience and personal growth [5][6]. - The article references the book "The Coddling of the American Mind," which critiques the overemphasis on safety, suggesting that excessive protection can lead to increased fragility among youth [5][6]. Group 4: Societal Impact - The pandemic has heightened societal sensitivity to risks, affecting not only university policies but also educational practices in primary and secondary schools, where safety measures have restricted children's freedom [6]. - The article calls for a shift away from "safetyism" to allow for a more balanced approach to risk, enabling both university students and younger children to grow within a framework of reasonable safety [7].