ICML 2025杰出论文出炉：8篇获奖，南大研究者榜上有名

Core Insights - The article discusses the announcement of the best paper awards at ICML 2025, highlighting the significance of the conference in the AI research community [3][4]. - A total of 8 papers were awarded, including 6 outstanding papers and 2 outstanding position papers, with notable contributions from researchers at Nanjing University [4]. Submission Statistics - This year, ICML received 12,107 valid paper submissions, with 3,260 accepted, resulting in an acceptance rate of 26.9% [5]. - The number of submissions increased significantly from 9,653 in 2024, indicating a growing interest in the AI field [5]. Outstanding Papers - Paper 1: "Train for the Worst, Plan for the Best: Understanding Token Ordering in Masked Diffusions" explores the performance of masked diffusion models (MDMs) compared to autoregressive models (ARMs), demonstrating that adaptive token decoding can significantly enhance MDMs' performance [10][12][13]. - Paper 2: Investigates the impact of predictive technologies on welfare distribution in the context of fairness, providing a framework for policymakers to make principled decisions [17][19]. - Paper 3: Introduces CollabLLM, a training framework that enhances collaboration between humans and large language models, achieving an 18.5% improvement in task performance [22][26][27]. - Paper 4: Proposes a minimal algorithm task to quantify the creative limits of current language models, arguing for the superiority of multi-token methods over next-token prediction [28][32][34]. - Paper 5: Discusses conformal prediction from a Bayesian perspective, offering a practical alternative for uncertainty quantification in high-risk scenarios [35][39]. - Paper 6: Addresses score matching with missing data, providing methods to handle incomplete datasets effectively [40][44]. Outstanding Position Papers - Position Paper 1: Advocates for a dual feedback mechanism in peer review processes to enhance accountability and quality in AI conference submissions [49][51][53]. - Position Paper 2: Emphasizes the need to prioritize the impact of AI on the future of work, suggesting comprehensive support for transitions in labor markets affected by AI [54][56][58].