律师10年体检“未见异常”到癌症晚期，爱康国宾回应争议

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving lawyer Zhang Xiaoling, who was diagnosed with late-stage cancer after ten years of health check-ups at Aikang Guobin, raises serious concerns about the reliability and accuracy of commercial health check-up services in China, highlighting issues such as misdiagnosis and negligence in cancer risk detection [1][3][15]. Group 1: Incident Overview - Zhang Xiaoling underwent annual health check-ups at Aikang Guobin from 2013 to 2023, with all reports indicating "no significant abnormalities" [5][7]. - Despite consistent normal results for cancer markers, she was diagnosed with kidney cancer in 2024 after switching to a different health check-up provider [7][9]. - The case has sparked widespread public discussion and distrust towards commercial health check-up institutions, with many sharing similar negative experiences [2][3]. Group 2: Industry Issues - The health check-up industry is facing a crisis of trust, with reports of exaggerated marketing, rushed procedures, and critical tests being missed or misinterpreted [3][15]. - Complaints against Aikang Guobin have reached 1,306, including issues related to misdiagnosis and erroneous test results [12]. - The industry has been criticized for practices such as "fake check-ups" and inadequate patient communication regarding health risks [14][15]. Group 3: Expert Opinions - Experts emphasize the importance of regular health check-ups for early cancer detection, particularly for high-risk groups [9][16]. - The complexity of cancer and limitations in current screening technologies mean that not all cancers can be detected early, underscoring the need for comprehensive health management [15][16]. - The case illustrates the critical need for improved standards and accountability in health check-up services to ensure patient safety and trust [15][18]. Group 4: Company Response - Aikang Guobin has stated that the detection of cancer depends on various factors, including the timing of the check-up and the methods used, and they are willing to accept responsibility if found at fault [18]. - The company highlighted that their reports accurately reflect the results at the time of testing and that they will consult third-party experts for further analysis [18].