没有参照物？国资科创企业资产评估酿变

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by state-owned enterprises in China regarding asset valuation in the context of technological innovation, highlighting the need for improved evaluation methods and regulatory frameworks to adapt to rapid technological advancements [1][10][38]. Group 1: Challenges in Asset Valuation - The speed of technological advancement has outpaced the ability of existing evaluation systems to adapt, leading to difficulties in valuing innovative technologies [2][3]. - A specific case involves a deep-sea exploration patent where the valuation process faced significant disagreements over projected market penetration rates, with the technical team predicting over 30% while evaluators suggested only 15% [6][18]. - The lack of market comparables for certain assets creates a "deadlock" in valuation, as seen in the case of a geological exploration company's data assets, which were undervalued due to the absence of transaction references [28][30]. Group 2: Regulatory Developments - The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) is working on revising asset evaluation management systems to provide targeted regulations for the valuation of assets in the technology innovation sector [11][38]. - New regulations allow for alternative valuation methods for "core" technologies, but practical implementation remains challenging due to existing evaluation frameworks [19][38]. - The Ministry of Finance is guiding the establishment of a comprehensive asset evaluation standard system, which includes 33 evaluation standards that must be adhered to by evaluation institutions [39][40]. Group 3: Operational Inefficiencies - The current asset evaluation process is lengthy, often taking 2 to 3 months, which discourages investment in innovative enterprises [36]. - There is a general lack of a robust evaluation methodology tailored for state-owned technology enterprises, leading to increased risks in valuation outcomes [35]. - The complexity of operational processes in state-owned venture capital further complicates investment and exit decision-making [36].