“智驾”事故谁担责？公安部明确→

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the "smart driving" systems currently available in the Chinese market do not possess "autonomous driving" capabilities and remain in the assisted driving phase, where human drivers are still the primary responsible parties for vehicle operation [1][2]. Group 1: Current State of Smart Driving - The smart driving industry is in a critical transition phase from assisted driving to higher-level intelligence, with issues such as vague function definitions and unclear responsibility allocations posing safety risks [2]. - The majority of smart driving features offered by automakers are classified as Level 2 (L2) assisted driving, while Level 3 (L3) is seen as a pivotal point for the industry [1][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Developments - Following the Xiaomi SU7 accident, there has been increased scrutiny on smart driving safety, leading to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) proposing a series of regulatory requirements for the industry [3][4]. - The MIIT has initiated the drafting of mandatory national standards for the safety requirements of smart driving systems, marking a significant step towards establishing safety baselines [3]. Group 3: Responsibilities and Management - The Ministry of Public Security plans to enhance management of the smart driving sector by collaborating with various departments to enforce three main areas: strengthening automaker management, improving legal frameworks, and enhancing public awareness [5][6]. - Automakers are urged to clearly communicate the limitations and risks associated with their smart driving systems, ensuring that users are well-informed about the functionalities and safety measures [5][6].