造谣“大熊猫被虐”，假“猫粉”敛财17万

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the rise of misinformation regarding giant pandas, driven by individuals posing as "fans" to exploit public sentiment for financial gain [1][2][3]. Group 1: Misinformation and Legal Actions - Recent legal actions in Sichuan have addressed multiple cases of rumors related to "abuse of giant pandas," revealing an underlying profit-driven motive [2][4]. - The court sentenced two individuals, Bai and Xu, for spreading false information about panda abuse, with their fabricated videos receiving over 545,000 views [4][6]. - Bai, known as "Daliao Huanghou," and her husband Xu, were found to have created a network of over ten groups on various platforms, misleadingly portraying themselves as panda advocates [5][6]. Group 2: Profit Mechanisms - Bai and Xu reportedly earned over 170,000 yuan through live streaming and fundraising, utilizing emotional manipulation to generate traffic and revenue [6][7]. - Their tactics included fabricating rumors about panda research facilities and experts, inciting public outrage and harassment against professionals in the field [7][8]. Group 3: Characteristics of Misinformation - The misinformation spread by these individuals often involved sensational claims, such as allegations of unethical practices in panda breeding centers [7][8]. - They also engaged in emotional manipulation by editing videos to create misleading narratives that attracted significant viewer engagement [8][9]. - The article notes that some "fans" are encouraged to participate in tasks that enhance the influence of these misinformation spreaders, further monetizing their activities [9]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The article discusses the increasing number of panda "fans" in China, with a wide age range, some of whom are susceptible to misinformation due to a lack of understanding of panda conservation [14]. - It emphasizes the need for fans to rely on authoritative sources for accurate information about giant pandas, as emotional responses can lead to harmful behaviors [15]. - The article also points out the inadequacies in content regulation on live streaming platforms, suggesting a need for updated legislation to address these issues [16].