时报观察丨智驾评测引争议 测试体系亟需“定盘星”

Core Viewpoint - The recent closed testing of 36 popular models equipped with driver assistance systems revealed a shocking average pass rate of only 35.73%, highlighting a significant gap between manufacturer claims and actual performance [1][2]. Group 1: Testing Results and Industry Reaction - None of the 36 tested models achieved a full score, raising concerns about the reliability of the technology [1]. - The testing results have sparked controversy, with some technical bloggers questioning the rigor of the testing methods and the design of the scenarios [1]. - Several car manufacturers have publicly refrained from commenting on the test results, implying disagreement with the findings [1]. Group 2: Regulatory and Policy Implications - The head of the Traffic Management Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security stated that currently sold vehicles in China with "smart driving" systems do not possess "autonomous driving" capabilities [1]. - The Ministry of Public Security plans to collaborate with the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology to conduct comprehensive tests to clarify system capabilities and safety measures [1]. - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology emphasized the importance of developing a robust testing framework for intelligent connected vehicles [1][2]. Group 3: Future Directions for the Industry - The improvement of the intelligent driving testing system is essential to meet industry needs and enhance consumer understanding of technology limits [2]. - Long-term safety in intelligent driving requires both accelerated technological advancements and a stable testing framework [2]. - The resolution of the current controversy could serve as a catalyst for the industry to transition from "wild growth" to "regulated development" [2].