别指望几百块钱什么病都查出来！爱康国宾CEO暴露了行业潜规则

Core Viewpoint - The company, Aikang Guobin, is taking legal action against lawyer Zhang for defamation, claiming her allegations have harmed the reputation of the company and its employees, and misled the public about the private health examination industry in China [1][3]. Summary by Sections Company Response - Aikang Guobin held a media briefing to address the allegations made by Zhang, stating that her claims of "fake health examinations" are unfounded and have caused significant damage to the company's reputation and its employees [1][3]. - The company has filed a lawsuit against Zhang, which has been officially accepted by the court [1]. Health Examination Findings - Aikang Guobin presented evidence from Zhang's health examination reports, indicating that her diagnosis was early-stage kidney cancer, contrary to her claims of late-stage cancer [3]. - Zhang had undergone a basic health examination package provided by the Beijing Lawyers Association for ten years, without opting for any additional tests except in 2017 [3]. - The company emphasized that the purpose of health examinations is to identify risk signals rather than provide definitive diagnoses, highlighting that they have detected 15,000 cases of cancer among the 4.8 million new cancer diagnoses in China each year [3]. Allegations of Misdiagnosis - Zhang has publicly questioned the effectiveness of Aikang Guobin's health examinations, citing her own experience of being diagnosed with late-stage cancer after ten years of examinations without any indication of cancer risk [5]. - She has gathered support from other lawyers to pursue a public interest lawsuit against Aikang Guobin, alleging misdiagnosis and negligence in the health examination process [4][5]. Complaints and Industry Reputation - There have been numerous complaints against Aikang Guobin regarding inaccurate health examination reports, misdiagnosis, and negligence, with over 1,220 complaints recorded on consumer platforms [6]. - The company has stated that it is willing to accept evaluations from third-party authoritative institutions to clarify the situation and restore its reputation [7].