亮证奔驰女司机，身份公布

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving a traffic dispute between two drivers escalated due to the improper use of an administrative enforcement certificate, leading to public concern and an investigation by local authorities [1][4][11]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - On July 22, 2025, a traffic dispute occurred between a white Haval SUV driven by Li and a black Mercedes SUV driven by Hou over a narrow village road. Li refused to yield to Hou's unreasonable demands, prompting Hou to display an "administrative enforcement" certificate [2]. Investigation Findings - The investigation involved interviews, reviewing police records, and examining video evidence to address public concerns and Li's allegations [3]. Identity and Certificate of Hou - Hou, a 28-year-old employee of a private company, displayed a personal administrative enforcement certificate belonging to her husband, which was intended to intimidate Li. This misuse of the certificate has led to negative social repercussions, and an investigation is ongoing [4]. - The Mercedes was a second-hand purchase made in January 2025 for 178,000 yuan, with a down payment of 100,000 yuan and a loan of 78,000 yuan [4]. Personal Information Disclosure - Li, a 33-year-old individual, was identified as having no prior acquaintance with Hou, but a family connection existed through Hou's father, who recognized Li and disclosed his personal information during the dispute [5]. - Investigations confirmed that neither Hou nor her father had access to police databases, ruling out any illegal access to Li's personal information [6]. Police Response to Li's Report - On July 24, Li reported the incident to the police, expressing concerns about threats to his safety. The police determined it was a civil dispute and advised Li to resolve it amicably [7]. Police Actions Regarding Video Deletion - On July 31, Hou and her family reported that their vehicle information was leaked online, leading to a police visit to Li's home to request the deletion of the video he posted. Li refused to comply with the request [8]. Police Communication Issues - The police maintained proper procedures during their investigation, but there were issues with the clarity of communication when contacting Li [9]. Media Interaction - A police officer mishandled a media inquiry, leading to internal criticism and a directive for improvement in communication protocols [10]. Future Actions - The incident highlights the need for stricter management of personnel and better responsiveness to public concerns. The local government plans to implement comprehensive reforms and address any misconduct identified during the investigation [11].