马太效应凸显！做市商成ETF“救命稻草”？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by many ETFs due to significant homogenization and poor management, leading to a decline in their market presence and liquidity issues [1][7]. Group 1: ETF Market Dynamics - Many ETFs, including the popular CSI A500 ETFs, have experienced a sharp reduction in shares this year, with some products facing liquidity shortages due to small scale [1][7]. - The "Matthew Effect" in the ETF market is becoming more pronounced, with larger funds attracting more investment while smaller funds struggle to gain traction, leading to potential liquidation risks for underperforming products [7][8]. Group 2: Introduction of Market Makers - Several public funds have announced the addition of brokerages as market makers for their ETF products to enhance liquidity in the secondary market [2][3]. - As of August 1, multiple funds, including those from Guolian Fund and Huatai-PineBridge Fund, have signed agreements with brokerages to facilitate trading operations for their ETFs [3]. Group 3: Liquidity Services and Market Coverage - By June 2025, the Shanghai Stock Exchange had 20 primary market makers and 12 general market makers providing liquidity services for 746 fund products, with 98% of all ETFs having market maker coverage [4][5]. - The Shenzhen Stock Exchange had 27 liquidity service providers covering 491 ETF products, with many ETFs supported by multiple market makers [5]. Group 4: Importance of Market Makers - Analysts emphasize that the introduction of brokerages as primary market makers is crucial for improving trading efficiency and responding to complex trading demands [6]. - The growing role of liquidity service providers in the ETF ecosystem is highlighted, with a focus on the need for public funds to prioritize the management of ETF liquidity to seize growth opportunities [6].