不吹不黑，GPT-5代码能力究竟怎么样？跟 Gemini 和 Claude 的对比测试给你答案

Core Insights - The article discusses the release of GPT-5 and its comparative performance against other models like Claude 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro, highlighting improvements in code generation and overall functionality [2][54]. - It emphasizes the challenges in evaluating model capabilities due to subjective preferences in areas like emotional intelligence and writing style [3]. Group 1: Model Performance - GPT-5 shows significant improvements in code generation capabilities compared to previous models, effectively handling complex tasks and maintaining content structure [54][56]. - Claude 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro also completed major functionalities but faced issues with user interface and responsiveness [30][53]. - The article notes that GPT-5's adherence to style constraints and prompt instructions is superior, leading to better execution of tasks [54][56]. Group 2: User Experience - User experience with GPT-5 is reported to be satisfactory, with no major bugs and a well-organized layout across different pages [30][54]. - In contrast, Gemini 2.5 Pro's interface was criticized for being unattractive and lacking intuitive interaction [30][53]. - Claude 4.1 had issues with page width utilization during the payment process, affecting the overall user experience [53]. Group 3: Technical Specifications - GPT-5 supports a context window of up to 128K, which enhances its ability to manage larger inputs and maintain context over longer interactions [56]. - The article mentions that the models are evolving, with OpenAI's models being compared to Apple's in terms of performance and user expectations [55].