IPO审1过1

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the successful IPO application of Zhuhai Nante Metal Technology Co., Ltd. on the Beijing Stock Exchange, highlighting its business focus and financial performance. Group 1: Company Overview - Nante Technology is a high-tech enterprise primarily engaged in the research, development, production, and sales of precision mechanical components, particularly in the air conditioning compressor parts sector, covering key components such as cylinders, bearings, pistons, and crankshafts [5]. - The company was established in November 2009 and has a total share capital of 111,549,986 shares before the issuance. It operates seven wholly-owned subsidiaries and has no equity investments in other companies. As of the end of 2024, the total number of employees is 2,497 [5]. Group 2: Major Shareholder and Control - Cai Heng directly holds 54,458,574 shares, accounting for 48.82% of the total share capital before issuance, and serves as the chairman of the company, making him the controlling shareholder and actual controller [6]. Group 3: Financial Performance - During the reporting period, the company's operating revenue was 833,676.05 thousand yuan, 938,343.15 thousand yuan, and 1,030,864.14 thousand yuan, with net profits attributable to the parent company being 43,960.85 thousand yuan, 82,186.64 thousand yuan, and 94,690.58 thousand yuan respectively [7]. - As of December 31, 2024, total assets amounted to 1,416,714.17 thousand yuan, with total equity of 669,284.05 thousand yuan. The asset-liability ratio was 34.19%, and the gross profit margin was 22.65% [8]. Group 4: Inquiry Issues Raised - Questions were raised regarding the authenticity of operating performance, specifically the reasons for lower gross profit margins compared to competitors and the rationale behind certain accounting practices [9]. - Concerns about the sustainability of operating performance were also highlighted, including the sales growth rates to major clients and the company's competitive advantages [9]. - The necessity and rationality of fundraising projects were questioned, particularly in relation to existing production capacity and revenue growth rates [9].