长江保护法实施四年，执法司法协同如何守护“一江碧水”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the strengthening of law enforcement and judicial coordination across the Yangtze River basin to support ecological protection and high-quality development, emphasizing a system-wide governance approach and the importance of ecological prioritization and green development [3][9]. Summary by Sections Legal Framework and Achievements - The "Yangtze River Protection Law" has been in effect since March 1, 2021, leading to significant achievements in ecological protection through enhanced law enforcement, ecological restoration, and public participation, with 457,400 environmental resource cases adjudicated by courts in the basin [3][4]. Case Studies - A notable case involved the Shanghai court's handling of a bankruptcy restructuring for a port company, which integrated environmental governance into the restructuring process, attracting over 87 million yuan in investments while ensuring ecological commitments [4]. - In a case concerning virtual currency mining machines, a court ruled the sales contract invalid due to excessive energy consumption and carbon emissions, promoting lower carbon production practices [5]. Challenges in Environmental Protection - The article highlights ongoing challenges in environmental law enforcement, including lengthy and costly environmental damage assessments, lack of unified standards, and the complexity of information sharing among various departments [6][9]. - Discrepancies in judicial outcomes for similar environmental offenses were noted, with significant variations in penalties and ecological compensation responsibilities across different cases [7]. Recommendations for Improvement - The article outlines recommendations from the recent opinion issued by 12 government departments, focusing on unified standards for law enforcement, enhanced collaboration across administrative regions, and improved ecological assessment practices [9][10]. - It emphasizes the need for a coordinated approach to environmental governance, including the establishment of a shared database for ecological law enforcement and judicial information to avoid data silos [9][10].