中关村储能产业技术联盟·2025-08-15 07:06Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the results of the centralized procurement project for lithium iron phosphate battery energy storage systems by China Energy Construction for the year 2025, highlighting the competitive bidding process and the pricing details of the awarded contracts [2][6]. Summary by Sections Procurement Results - The total procurement volume is 25 GWh, divided into three bidding sections: - Section 001 (1C, 1-hour system): 3 GWh, average price of 0.767 yuan/Wh, with bids ranging from 0.673 to 0.89 yuan/Wh [2][6]. - Section 002 (0.5C, 2-hour system): 12 GWh, average price of 0.453 yuan/Wh, with bids ranging from 0.416 to 0.54 yuan/Wh [3][6]. - Section 003 (0.25C, 4-hour system): 10 GWh, average price of 0.419 yuan/Wh, with bids ranging from 0.37 to 0.495 yuan/Wh [4][6]. Bidding Participants - A total of 70 companies participated in the bidding, with 31 companies winning contracts. - Eight companies won contracts in all three sections, including CRRC Zhuzhou Electric Locomotive Research Institute, Sungrow Power Supply, Envision Energy, Wanbang Digital Energy, Electric Power Era, Pinggao Group, CATL, and Tiancheng Tongchuang [6][7]. - Fifteen companies won contracts in two sections, while eight companies won contracts in one section [6]. Bidder Requirements - Bidders were required to have specific project experience within the last two years, with minimum contract performance requirements for each section: - Section 001: At least 100 MWh of contract performance for 1C systems [6]. - Section 002: At least 1000 MWh of contract performance for 0.5C systems [6]. - Section 003: At least 500 MWh of contract performance for 0.25C systems [6]. Pricing Details - The article provides detailed pricing for each winning bid, with notable prices such as: - CRRC Zhuzhou at 2.286 billion yuan for Section 001 [7]. - CATL at 2.16 billion yuan for Section 001 [7]. - Sungrow at 2.67 billion yuan for Section 001 [7]. - The competitive nature of the bidding is reflected in the wide range of prices across different bidders [6][8].