超20只，逆市亏损！

Core Viewpoint - Despite a bullish market over the past year, more than 20 actively managed equity funds have recorded negative returns, highlighting performance disparities within the fund industry [2][4]. Group 1: Market Performance - The major indices, including the Shanghai Composite Index, Shenzhen Component Index, and ChiNext Index, have seen cumulative gains of approximately 30%, 40%, and 60% respectively over the past year [4]. - As of August 18, 5033 actively managed equity funds have an average net value growth rate of 34.65%, with a median of 30.65%, and 99.56% of these funds recorded positive returns [4]. Group 2: Underperforming Funds - Over 20 actively managed equity funds have posted negative returns, with the worst-performing fund declining over 6%, resulting in a performance gap of more than 255 percentage points compared to the top-performing fund [4][5]. - These underperforming funds have also lagged behind their performance benchmarks, with the highest underperformance exceeding 25 percentage points [5]. Group 3: Fund Characteristics - Many of the underperforming funds are classified as "mini funds," with assets under management of less than 50 million yuan, which face operational challenges due to their small size [8]. - The underperformance is attributed to factors such as significant deviations from market trends, high fixed management costs, and limited flexibility in stock selection and position adjustments [8][9]. Group 4: Specific Fund Examples - Tianzhi Core Growth Fund has a net value growth rate of -6.5% over the past year, significantly underperforming the average return of 40.97% for similar funds [8]. - Guorong Rongxin Consumer Select Fund has a decline of 6.21% over the past year, with a cumulative net value drop of over 44% in the last five years [9]. - Beixin Ruifeng External Growth Fund has also seen a decline of over 5% in the past year, with a cumulative net value growth rate of 43.40% since its inception [9].