8个月内，6家券商撤回基金托管牌照申请

Core Viewpoint - The recent regulatory changes in the fund custody sector have led to a significant withdrawal of applications from small and medium-sized securities firms, indicating a shift from quantity expansion to quality competition in the industry [1][7][10]. Group 1: Regulatory Changes and Impact - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has published data showing that only three institutions are currently applying for fund custody qualifications, with Dongwu Securities being the only remaining securities firm in the queue [1][3]. - A total of six small and medium-sized securities firms have withdrawn their applications for fund custody qualifications within just over eight months, primarily due to the new regulations raising the entry barriers [1][7]. - The new regulations require a minimum net asset of 300 billion RMB for securities firms, which many smaller firms cannot meet, leading to their withdrawal from the application process [7][8]. Group 2: Industry Concentration and Trends - The fund custody industry is experiencing a concentration trend, with banks and a few large securities firms managing approximately 80%-90% of public and private investment funds [10]. - Among the seven securities firms that previously applied for fund custody qualifications, only Dongwu Securities meets the new net asset requirement, highlighting the increasing disparity between large and small firms [8][10]. - The market is witnessing a "stronger get stronger, weaker get marginalized" dynamic, as larger firms capture over 80% of the market share while smaller firms are forced to pivot to lower-margin businesses [12]. Group 3: Strategic Value of Custody Licenses - Obtaining a fund custody license provides securities firms with strategic advantages, allowing them to integrate various services and enhance their revenue structure through value-added services [11]. - The top five securities firms in terms of fund custody numbers account for 65.71% of the total, indicating a significant concentration in the private fund sector [12]. - Smaller firms that cannot meet the new regulatory requirements may need to explore differentiated survival strategies, such as partnering with larger firms for operational support [12].