理性之上，重新审视科学的认知“盲点”

Core Concept - The article discusses the concept of "blind spots" in both vision and scientific understanding, emphasizing that humans often overlook evident truths due to cognitive biases, which shape their perception of modern science [3][6][8]. Group 1: Understanding Science - Science has become an indispensable cognitive tool in daily life, necessitating awareness of inherent "blind spots" and the historical context of scientific discourse [6]. - Different attitudes towards science exist, with some viewing it as an endless potential for discovery, while others caution against its rapid development, suggesting a need for reevaluation to prevent irreversible harm to society and the environment [6][7]. - The authors of "What is Science" diagnose a crisis in modern science, attributing it to the adoption of a "blind spot" worldview that obscures the true nature of scientific inquiry [6][8]. Group 2: Limitations of Modern Science - Modern science, while rooted in human subjective experience, is increasingly distancing itself from direct experience, leaning towards mathematical abstraction [7]. - The limitations of modern science are highlighted in addressing complex global challenges such as climate change, habitat destruction, and emerging diseases, revealing the inadequacies of abstract theories in practical applications [7][8]. - The authors argue that the over-reliance on abstract theories has hindered humanity's ability to effectively address real-world issues [7][8]. Group 3: The Nature of Scientific Inquiry - The book emphasizes that science is a product of human experience, and the process of refining this experience has led to a perception of scientific authority [8]. - The authors critique the reductionist view in life sciences, advocating for a holistic understanding of life that acknowledges its dynamic and autonomous nature [11]. - The final sections of the book reflect on the impact of the "blind spot" worldview on environmental issues, linking it to global crises like climate change and pandemics [11][12]. Group 4: Overcoming Blind Spots - The authors propose that recognizing the existence of blind spots is the first step towards overcoming them, advocating for a rejection of errors that neglect human experience [12]. - They do not dismiss the value of science or abstract thinking but criticize the philosophical bias that leads to overlooking human experience [12].