Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing debate surrounding the "divorce cooling-off period" in China, particularly in light of recent tragic events that have raised concerns about its implications for domestic violence and individual rights [3][5][6]. Summary by Sections Background of the Divorce Cooling-off Period - The divorce cooling-off period, effective from January 1, 2021, allows a 30-day period for couples to reconsider their decision to divorce after submitting an application [3][4]. - This regulation aims to reduce impulsive or hasty divorces, reflecting new circumstances in the marriage and family sector in China [4]. Arguments For and Against the Cooling-off Period - Supporters argue that the cooling-off period provides a buffer to prevent impulsive divorces, benefiting family stability and protecting the interests of minor children [5]. - Critics, including national political advisor Jiang Shengnan, argue that it restricts the divorce freedom of the majority due to the actions of a minority, potentially exacerbating risks for vulnerable individuals in abusive relationships [5][6]. Recent Incidents and Public Sentiment - Recent tragic incidents, such as the murder of children during the cooling-off period, have intensified public scrutiny and criticism of the policy [3][5]. - Social media discussions reveal a significant amount of support for abolishing or reforming the cooling-off period, indicating widespread discontent with its current implementation [6][8]. Proposed Reforms - Legal experts suggest that if the cooling-off period is retained, it should be differentiated based on circumstances, allowing immediate divorce proceedings in cases of domestic violence or asset transfer [7]. - Recommendations include enhancing support services like professional mediation, psychological counseling, and legal advice to protect individuals at risk during the cooling-off period [7]. Conclusion - The article emphasizes the need for ongoing research and dialogue regarding the cooling-off period, highlighting that the law should reflect the will of the people and enhance individual happiness rather than uphold outdated norms [8].
贵州毒杀儿女案,再次拷问“离婚冷静期”
第一财经·2025-08-22 04:33