「开发者私下更喜欢用GPT-5写代码」，Claude还坐得稳编程王座吗？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the competitive landscape between Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI's GPT-5 in the programming model space, highlighting a shift in user preference towards GPT-5 due to its superior performance in various programming tasks [1][3][8]. Summary by Sections Performance Comparison - Claude Opus 4.1 has shown significant improvements in programming tasks, particularly in multi-file code refactoring, as per the SWE-bench Verified tests [1]. - However, GPT-5 has gained popularity among users, with many reporting a preference for its capabilities over Claude, especially in handling complex programming tasks [3][8]. User Feedback - Users have noted that GPT-5 is perceived as the best programming model available, with one developer stating it is the most effective model they have used [5]. - Feedback indicates that GPT-5 excels in instruction following and large-scale refactoring tasks, outperforming Claude in these areas [6]. User Experience - Some users express a continued appreciation for Claude, particularly for its speed in code completion tasks, but acknowledge that GPT-5 is gaining their trust for more complex tasks [4]. - A software engineer highlighted that Claude tends to perform poorly outside of coding tasks, exhibiting high hallucination rates in other domains, while GPT-5 maintains lower hallucination rates and better search capabilities [9][10]. General Sentiment - There is a growing consensus among users that GPT-5's programming capabilities are superior, with many shifting their focus from Claude to GPT-5 for coding tasks [7][8]. - Users who initially doubted GPT-5 have reported positive experiences after using it, indicating a shift in perception regarding its effectiveness across various fields [11].