硅料“收储”不能背离市场化法治化｜反内卷系列评论

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the "silicon material storage plan" in the polysilicon industry, which aims to adjust production capacity and combat market "involution" through a market-driven approach led by major companies [2][4][7]. Group 1: Market Dynamics - Several leading polysilicon companies mentioned the "silicon material storage plan" during their mid-year earnings calls, leading to a surge in their stock prices [2]. - The storage plan involves the acquisition of "backward" production capacity by major companies using their own and financial institution funds, aiming to gradually exit this capacity to adjust the industry structure [2][4]. - The polysilicon industry is currently facing low capacity utilization and declining product prices, prompting the need for such a storage plan [2][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Challenges - The storage plan must operate within a market-oriented and legal framework to avoid significant antitrust risks, as outlined in the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People's Republic of China [3][6]. - The potential for monopolistic behavior exists if major companies coordinate production capacity, which could violate antitrust regulations [3][6]. Group 3: Long-term Implications - While the storage plan may provide immediate relief, it is essential to evaluate its long-term impacts on the industry, particularly regarding market competition and efficiency [4][5]. - The plan could lead to increased market share and profits for major companies, but it may also hinder competition by creating a cooperative mechanism among these companies [5][6]. - Historical examples, such as the "trusts" in late 19th century America, illustrate the potential negative effects of such cooperative arrangements on industry innovation [5][6]. Group 4: Broader Industry Context - The "involution" in the polysilicon industry has complex causes, including local government influences and inadequate intellectual property protections [7]. - The storage plan is seen as just a starting point, with a need for ongoing government regulation and corporate innovation to address the root causes of industry challenges [7].